Non-drivable roads: Difference between revisions View history

mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:
'''Destination'''<br />
'''Destination'''<br />
If a footpath leads from a normal road to a Walking Trail, but this path has no destinations / [[house numbers]],  
If a footpath leads from a normal road to a Walking Trail, but this path has no destinations / [[house numbers]],  
should it be defined as PB or is a PB skipped in the routing and should we take WT without house numbers?
should it be defined as PB or is a PB skipped in the routing and should we take WT without house numbers?<br />
[[File:Destination-via-walking-trail.png|right]]
Best use a WT, see picture below.<br />
Best use a WT without house numbers, else the connected WT isn't anymore directly connected to a drivable segment.
<br />
 
<br />


[[File:Routing-non-drivable.png|600px]]
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
'''Public transport'''<br />
'''Public transport'''<br />

Revision as of 00:19, 23 March 2018

We are currently updating the pages to include all regionally different guidelines. If you find inconsistencies, please refer to the English page. Thank you!
Other languages:

Non-drivable roads

The non-drivable road types are:


Walking Trail or Pedestrian Boardwalk

Destination
If a footpath leads from a normal road to a Walking Trail, but this path has no destinations / house numbers, should it be defined as PB or is a PB skipped in the routing and should we take WT without house numbers?
Best use a WT, see picture below.



Public transport
The previous standard "Use Walking trails for public transport" is changed into "use Non-drivable roads for public transport". because both non-drivable roadtypes have now a fix. Preference for PB because public transport lanes shouldn’t have (by accident) destinations.




  Main Page | Index