Rhode Island/To do: Difference between revisions Discussion View history

Revision as of 19:18, 31 May 2021

Press here to return to the To do section to see your changes

Want to help out with the map in Rhode Island? Below, you'll find a number of projects that are currently in progress around the state. If you would like to participate, please update the table below with your progress, and mark the appropriate cell with a yellow background color. Once that portion is 100% complete, indicate this with a green background color.

If you need to know how to update the wiki, check out this article about wiki editing. You can also watch this short video to get a better idea on how to modify the wiki.

Happy editing!

Ramp Turn Instructions

With the updates made to turn instruction overrides, we now need to update all ramps and wayfinders with new instructions in preparation for the feature being turned on in the app. We also need to rename all ramps based on the new guidance for ramp names.

Speed Limits: Streets

Thanks to the Map Raid, Rhode Island is the #1 state in the New England region for speed limit implementation! But there's still a lot of work to be done, as the Map Raid only focused on non-street speed limits. This section is for tracking the progress of adding speed limits to all the street segments in the state and getting us even closer to 100% implementation.

Village Confirmation

During the Map Raid, one of the main goals was to implement Rhode Island's Villages policy. While most of the work was very well done, there was still some confusion on how to implement it. This project is for confirming that all roads and places adhere to the existing village guidelines, which includes having the village name be the primary city name on all segments and places within the village, and proper naming of segments with route numbers.

School Places

Given that most schools in the state of Rhode Island consist of a single large building with unique shapes, it was decided that all schools that fit this description should have their Place areas conform to the shape of the building rather than to the boundaries of the property (as is the case with universities and other multi-building complexes). Thus, this project is tracking the progress of updating the existing school Area Places to match this guideline, or adding school Place Areas where none exist.

Functional Classification confirmation

With RIDOT recently updating their functional classifications, it's time for another review of road types in Rhode Island. Note that you can use the WME FC Layer script to easily catch discrepancies on the map. Just remember that the script isn't 100% infallible, so be sure to check for things like federal and state routes affecting FC.

Town/Village	Ramps	Villages	Schools	FC
Ashaway		100%	100%	100%
Barrington		N/A	100%	100%
Bradford	N/A	100%	100%	100%
Bristol	N/A	N/A	100%	100%
Burrillville	N/A	N/A	N/A	100%
Carolina	N/A	100%	N/A	100%
Central Falls	N/A	N/A	100%
Charlestown		N/A	100%	100%
Chepachet	N/A		100%	100%
Clayville	N/A	100%	100%	100%
Coventry	N/A	N/A	100%	100%
Cranston		N/A	100%	100%
Cumberland		N/A
East Greenwich		N/A		100%
East Providence		N/A	100%	100%
Exeter		N/A	100%	100%
Foster	N/A	N/A	100%	100%
Greene	N/A		100%	100%
Greenville	N/A			100%
Harrisville	N/A		100%	100%
Hope	N/A	100%	100%	100%
Hope Valley		100%	100%	100%
Hopkinton	N/A	N/A	N/A	100%
Jamestown		N/A	100%	100%
Johnston		N/A		100%
Kenyon	N/A	100%	N/A	100%
Kingston	N/A	100%	100%	100%
Lincoln		N/A
Little Compton	N/A	N/A	100%	100%
Manville		100%	100%
Mapleville	N/A	100%	N/A	100%
Middletown	N/A	N/A		100%
Narragansett		N/A		100%
New Shoreham	N/A	N/A	100%	100%
Newport		N/A		100%
North Kingstown		N/A		100%
North Providence		N/A	100%
North Scituate			100%	100%
North Smithfield		N/A	100%	100%
Oakland	N/A	100%	N/A	100%
Pascoag	N/A		100%	100%
Pawtucket		N/A
Portsmouth		N/A		100%
Providence		N/A	50% GooberKing
Riverside		100%	100%	100%
Rumford	N/A	100%	100%	100%
Saunderstown		100%	100%	100%
Scituate	N/A	N/A	N/A	100%
Shannock	N/A	100%	N/A	100%
Slatersville	N/A	100%	N/A	100%
Slocum	N/A	100%	N/A	100%
Smithfield		N/A	100%	100%
Tiverton		N/A	100%	100%
Wakefield		100%		100%
Warren	N/A	N/A		100%
Warwick		N/A		100%
West Kingston	N/A	100%	100%	100%
West Greenwich		N/A	100%	100%
West Warwick		N/A		100%
Westerly		N/A		100%
Wood River Junction	N/A	100%	100%	100%
Woonsocket		N/A
Wyoming		100%	100%	100%

@@ Line 69: / Line 69: @@
 | style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" |N/A
 | style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" |N/A
-| style="text-align: center" |<!-- Burrillville Functional Classification Percentage -->
+| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" |100%
 |<!-- Burrillville Comments -->
 |-
@@ Line 101: / Line 101: @@
 | style="text-align: center" |<!-- Chepachet Village Implementation Percentage -->
 | style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" |100%
-| style="text-align: center" |<!-- Chepachet Functional Classification Percentage -->
+| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" |100%
 |<!-- Chepachet Comments -->
 |-
@@ Line 109: / Line 109: @@
 | style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" |100%
 | style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" |100%
-| style="text-align: center" |<!-- Clayville Functional Classification Percentage -->
+| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" |100%
 |<!-- Clayville Comments -->
 |-
@@ Line 125: / Line 125: @@
 | style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" |N/A
 | style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" |100%
-| style="text-align: center" |<!-- Cranston Functional Classification Percentage -->
+| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" |100%
 |<!-- Cranston Comments -->
 |-
@@ Line 165: / Line 165: @@
 | style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" |N/A
 | style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" |100%
-| style="text-align: center" |<!-- Foster Functional Classification Percentage -->
+| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" |100%
 |<!-- Foster Comments -->
 |-
@@ Line 181: / Line 181: @@
 | style="text-align: center" |<!-- Greenville Village Implementation Percentage -->
 | style="text-align: center" |<!-- Greenville School Places Percentage -->
-| style="text-align: center" |<!-- Greenville Functional Classification Percentage -->
+| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" |100%
 |<!-- Greenville Comments -->
 |-
@@ Line 189: / Line 189: @@
 | style="text-align: center" |<!-- Harrisville Village Implementation Percentage -->
 | style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" |100%
-| style="text-align: center" |<!-- Harrisville Functional Classification Percentage -->
+| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" |100%
 |<!-- Harrisville Comments -->
 |-
@@ Line 197: / Line 197: @@
 | style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" |100%
 | style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" |100%
-| style="text-align: center" |<!-- Hope Functional Classification Percentage -->
+| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" |100%
 |<!-- Hope Comments -->
 |-
@@ Line 229: / Line 229: @@
 | style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" |N/A
 | style="text-align: center" |<!-- Johnston School Places Percentage -->
-| style="text-align: center" |<!-- Johnston Functional Classification Percentage -->
+| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" |100%
 |<!-- Johnston Comments -->
 |-
@@ Line 277: / Line 277: @@
 | style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" |100%
 | style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" |N/A
-| style="text-align: center" |<!-- Mapleville Functional Classification Percentage -->
+| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" |100%
 |<!-- Mapleville Comments -->
 |-
@@ Line 301: / Line 301: @@
 | style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" |N/A
 | style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" |100%
-| style="text-align: center" |<!-- New Shoreham Functional Classification Percentage -->
+| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" |100%
 |<!-- New Shoreham Comments -->
 |-
@@ Line 333: / Line 333: @@
 | style="text-align: center" |<!-- North Scituate Village Implementation Percentage -->
 | style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" |100%
-| style="text-align: center" |<!-- North Scituate Functional Classification Percentage -->
+| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" |100%
 |<!-- North Scituate Comments -->
 |-
@@ Line 341: / Line 341: @@
 | style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" |N/A
 | style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" |100%
-| style="text-align: center" |<!-- North Smithfield Functional Classification Percentage -->
+| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" |100%
 |<!-- North Smithfield Comments -->
 |-
@@ Line 349: / Line 349: @@
 | style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" |100%
 | style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" |N/A
-| style="text-align: center" |<!-- Oakland Functional Classification Percentage -->
+| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" |100%
 |<!-- Oakland Comments -->
 |-
@@ Line 357: / Line 357: @@
 | style="text-align: center" |<!-- Pascoag Village Implementation Percentage -->
 | style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" |100%
-| style="text-align: center" |<!-- Pascoag Functional Classification Percentage -->
+| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" |100%
 |<!-- Pascoag Comments -->
 |-
@@ Line 413: / Line 413: @@
 | style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" |N/A
 | style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" |N/A
-| style="text-align: center" |<!-- Scituate Functional Classification Percentage -->
+| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" |100%
 |<!-- Scituate Comments -->
 |-
@@ Line 429: / Line 429: @@
 | style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" |100%
 | style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" |N/A
-| style="text-align: center" |<!-- Slatersville Functional Classification Percentage -->
+| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" |100%
 |<!-- Slatersville Comments -->
 |-
@@ Line 445: / Line 445: @@
 | style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" |N/A
 | style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" |100%
-| style="text-align: center" |<!-- Smithfield Functional Classification Percentage -->
+| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" |100%
 |<!-- Smithfield Comments -->
 |-