(Historical and current) |
(updating discussion links) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ForumLink| | Discussions generally happen in the forums: | ||
{{ForumLink|Named Residences|97839}} | |||
{{ForumLink|Limits in More Information Tab|133148}} | |||
Locked historical discussion: | Locked historical discussion: | ||
{{ForumLink|86461}} | {{ForumLink|[New Page Proposal] Places|86461}} | ||
== Question == | == Question == | ||
Revision as of 16:02, 17 March 2015
Discussions generally happen in the forums:
 |
You can bring up comments or questions about this in  Named Residences forum topic. |
|
You can bring up comments or questions about this in Limits in More Information Tab forum topic. |
Locked historical discussion:
|
You can bring up comments or questions about this in [New Page Proposal Places forum topic]. |
Question
The topic above (the first one) is locked. Where is the right place to discuss this page? In the section Places#When_to_use_Area_or_Point I did not understand why use point when the area is known. This seems stupid because area is always more precise than point, and when you define an area you can set the "main spot / entry" as a point. Well, also, if this rule should be really followed, why not just set point / area automatically after setting the category on WME? Thank you. --Hatzemberg (talk) 18:06, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah I agree.. seems very stupid though. area is much more acurate than point. what is the purpose of having an area if you are push to use a point?? ---Andylaode 07:51, 05 March 2015 (UTC)