Non-drivable roads/en: verschil tussen versies Geschiedenis weergeven

(Updating to match new version of source page)
Geen bewerkingssamenvatting
 
(17 tussenliggende versies door 2 gebruikers niet weergegeven)
Regel 11: Regel 11:


Page on the [[Non-drivable roads lock level|Locking level of non-drivable roads]].<br />
Page on the [[Non-drivable roads lock level|Locking level of non-drivable roads]].<br />
<br />
'''Belgium F99 sign'''<br />
[[File:Non-routable-agricultural-vehicle.png|right|110px|Belgium F99 sign]] Belgium uses the F99 sign in a number of variants. The road is allowed for the type of traffic that is displayed on the sign. If this sign is used we've got the following mapping possibilities:
* If there are houses or other destinations along the segment ([[House numbers|house numbers]]), then a [[Private road|Private Road]] is used. Possibly to be completed with unpaved checked.
* If there are no destinations the road should be mapped as a [[Pedestrian Boardwalk]].
* If necessary, the road can be divided into a part with habitation (Private Road) and a part without habitation (Pedestrian Boardwalk).<br />
<br />
<br />
'''Use sparcely'''<br />
'''Use sparcely'''<br />
Regel 27: Regel 20:
<table width=90%>
<table width=90%>
<th align=left>Road type</th><th align=left>Description</th>
<th align=left>Road type</th><th align=left>Description</th>
<tr><td valign=top>[[Walking trail]]</td><td>Not able to drive with a vehicle<br />Possible destination along the segment</td></tr>
<tr><td valign=top>[[Walking trail]]</td><td>Not able to drive with a vehicle<br />Possible destination along the segment<br />Considered for routing if connected. <br /> Connect only via <i>[[Nodes|phantom nodes]] when a regular junction node isn't available</i>.
<tr><td valign=top>[[Pedestrian Boardwalk]]</td><td>Not able to drive with a vehicle<br />Does not have any destinations along the segment</td></tr>
</td></tr>
<tr><td valign=top>[[Pedestrian Boardwalk]]</td><td>Not able to drive with a vehicle<br />Does not have any destinations along the segment<br />
Not considered for routing. <br />
Play a role in [[Parking_Lot_Place|parking spaces]] suggestions based on walking time.<br />
Connect only via <i>[[Nodes|phantom nodes]] when a regular junction node isn't available</i>.</td></tr>
<tr><td valign=top>[[Private road]]</td><td>Able to drive with a vehicle<br />Not always allowed to drive with a car</td></tr>
<tr><td valign=top>[[Private road]]</td><td>Able to drive with a vehicle<br />Not always allowed to drive with a car</td></tr>
<tr><td valign=top>[[Street]] with [[Restrictions|restriction]]</td><td>Access restricted for certain vehicle types<br />Access restricted for certain hours of the day</td></tr>
<tr><td valign=top>[[Street]] with [[Restrictions|restriction]]</td><td>Access restricted for certain vehicle types<br />Access restricted for certain hours of the day</td></tr>
</table>
</table>
<br />
<br />
[[File:Non-driveables.png|600px]]
[[File:Non-driveables.png|600px]]


Regel 39: Regel 37:
'''Destination'''<br />
'''Destination'''<br />
If a footpath leads from a normal road to a Walking Trail, but this path has no destinations / [[house numbers]],  
If a footpath leads from a normal road to a Walking Trail, but this path has no destinations / [[house numbers]],  
should it be defined as PB or is a PB skipped in the routing and should we take WT without house numbers?<br />
should it be defined as PB or is a PB skipped in the [[Routing|routing]] and should we take WT without house numbers?<br />
Best use a WT, see picture below.<br />
Best use a WT, see picture below.<br />


Regel 46: Regel 44:
<br />
<br />
'''Public transport'''<br />
'''Public transport'''<br />
The previous standard "''Use Walking trails for public transport''" is changed into ''"use [[Pedestrian Boardwalk]] for public transport"''. because both non-drivable roadtypes have now a fix. Preference for PB because public transport lanes shouldn’t have (by accident) destinations.
The previous standard "''Use Walking trails for public transport''" is changed into ''"use [[Pedestrian Boardwalk]] for public transport"''. because both non-drivable roadtypes have now a fix. Preference for PB because public transport lanes shouldn’t have (by accident) destinations. But [[Pedestrian Boardwalk]] should not be chosen if they can be used by <i>taxis</i>.  
<br />
<br />
   
   
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
{{Bottomline}}
{{Bottomline}}

Huidige versie van 20 feb 2022 om 22:22

Andere talen:

Non-drivable roads

The non-drivable road types are:


* Not able means in this context not able or not allowed. On many foot paths and bicycle paths it is physical possible to drive with a car or motor cycle, but these road types shouldn't be used by this type of traffic.

Page on the Locking level of non-drivable roads.

Use sparcely
Non-drivable roads like walking trails and pedestrian boardwalks shouldn't be added, unless there is a good reason. Check the Wiki pages on these road types: Walking trail and Pedestrian Boardwalk.

Not or not always drivable

We often get the question "how do we map non-drivable or restricted access roads?" In the table below you will see what to do in every situation.

Road typeDescription
Walking trailNot able to drive with a vehicle
Possible destination along the segment
Considered for routing if connected.
Connect only via phantom nodes when a regular junction node isn't available.
Pedestrian BoardwalkNot able to drive with a vehicle
Does not have any destinations along the segment

Not considered for routing.
Play a role in parking spaces suggestions based on walking time.

Connect only via phantom nodes when a regular junction node isn't available.
Private roadAble to drive with a vehicle
Not always allowed to drive with a car
Street with restrictionAccess restricted for certain vehicle types
Access restricted for certain hours of the day


Walking Trail or Pedestrian Boardwalk

Destination
If a footpath leads from a normal road to a Walking Trail, but this path has no destinations / house numbers, should it be defined as PB or is a PB skipped in the routing and should we take WT without house numbers?
Best use a WT, see picture below.



Public transport
The previous standard "Use Walking trails for public transport" is changed into "use Pedestrian Boardwalk for public transport". because both non-drivable roadtypes have now a fix. Preference for PB because public transport lanes shouldn’t have (by accident) destinations. But Pedestrian Boardwalk should not be chosen if they can be used by taxis.


Main Page | Index