User:Machete808/Using external sources View history

(Added content from existing page)
Tags: mobile edit mobile web edit
 
(Added content to make page more suited to US editors)
 
Line 4: Line 4:
Usage of any external copyrighted source of information, in order to add information to the Waze database or maps, is not allowed. External copyright information includes any online or printed map information that is not provided by Waze through the Waze Map Editor interface.
Usage of any external copyrighted source of information, in order to add information to the Waze database or maps, is not allowed. External copyright information includes any online or printed map information that is not provided by Waze through the Waze Map Editor interface.


With the recent acquisition of Waze by Google, Inc., changes have been made to the Waze Map Editor to include updated aerial and street view images from Google. These are considered internal sources and completely acceptable to be used in creating map information for Waze. Google's terms of use restricts use of their map information to specific conditions and Waze has the proper licensing to use what you see inside the Waze Map Editor, but nothing else.
With the recent acquisition of Waze by Google, Inc., changes have been made to the Waze Map Editor to include updated aerial and Street View images from Google. These are considered internal sources and completely acceptable to be used in creating map information for Waze. Google's terms of use restricts use of their map information to specific conditions and Waze has the proper licensing to use what you see inside the Waze Map Editor, but nothing else.


Using any source of external copyright information puts the Waze maps under danger of being forced to revert all changes done to the map in your area / country.
'''However, editors must not assume that the street names appearing along the street surfaces in Waze Street View are accurate, and should check against visible street signs or other permissible reference material.'''


If any user were to do such a thing, it would taint all the work that person did on the maps and Waze would need to reverse out all those edits. There could also be other adverse effects. Waze has already had to remove all the maps for Chile, and other South American countries because the source of the map data was not properly licensed (not the result of any Waze action).
Using any source of external copyright information puts the Waze maps under danger of being forced to revert all changes done to the map in some countries.


Users may negotiate with officials in their country for access to aerial images that Waze can use. The user must be careful not to give the impression that they are acting on behalf of Waze. But as an interested citizen any user can speak with local authority, in a local language, to explain the benefits to their country in making aerial images freely available as a public good.
'''Editors in the U.S. will find that many government source maps are in the public domain and can be used for sources. However, they should be aware — especially if they work on international map raids, that this may not be true for other countries. There, if any user were to use unauthorized sources,''' it would taint all the work that person did on the maps and Waze would need to reverse out all those edits. There could also be other adverse effects. Waze has already had to remove all the maps for Chile, and other South American countries because the source of the map data was not properly licensed (not the result of any Waze action).


Note that external copyright information does not include any source of information that is provided by Waze through the internal tools of the online editor or application. Also any information developed independently by a user being physically present at a site is acceptable to add to the map as long as it is provided without copyright.
''Users may negotiate with officials in their country for access to aerial images that Waze can use. The user must be careful not to give the impression that they are acting on behalf of Waze. But as an interested citizen any user can speak with local authority, in a local language, to explain the benefits to their country in making aerial images freely available as a public good.
''
 
Even in the U.S., editors should avoid too much reliance on maps from state or local governments; some of them also contract with private companies for data with licenses that don't authorize use by commercial companies like Waze.
 
Note that external copyright information does not include any source of information that is provided by Waze through the internal tools of the online Waze Map Editor or the application. '''Also, any information about points of interest issued publicly by the business or official representative,''' or that is developed independently by a user being physically present at a site, is acceptable to add to the map as long as it is provided without copyright.

Latest revision as of 03:24, 4 October 2017

Using external sources

Usage of any external copyrighted source of information, in order to add information to the Waze database or maps, is not allowed. External copyright information includes any online or printed map information that is not provided by Waze through the Waze Map Editor interface.

With the recent acquisition of Waze by Google, Inc., changes have been made to the Waze Map Editor to include updated aerial and Street View images from Google. These are considered internal sources and completely acceptable to be used in creating map information for Waze. Google's terms of use restricts use of their map information to specific conditions and Waze has the proper licensing to use what you see inside the Waze Map Editor, but nothing else.

However, editors must not assume that the street names appearing along the street surfaces in Waze Street View are accurate, and should check against visible street signs or other permissible reference material.

Using any source of external copyright information puts the Waze maps under danger of being forced to revert all changes done to the map in some countries.

Editors in the U.S. will find that many government source maps are in the public domain and can be used for sources. However, they should be aware — especially if they work on international map raids, that this may not be true for other countries. There, if any user were to use unauthorized sources, it would taint all the work that person did on the maps and Waze would need to reverse out all those edits. There could also be other adverse effects. Waze has already had to remove all the maps for Chile, and other South American countries because the source of the map data was not properly licensed (not the result of any Waze action).

Users may negotiate with officials in their country for access to aerial images that Waze can use. The user must be careful not to give the impression that they are acting on behalf of Waze. But as an interested citizen any user can speak with local authority, in a local language, to explain the benefits to their country in making aerial images freely available as a public good.

Even in the U.S., editors should avoid too much reliance on maps from state or local governments; some of them also contract with private companies for data with licenses that don't authorize use by commercial companies like Waze.

Note that external copyright information does not include any source of information that is provided by Waze through the internal tools of the online Waze Map Editor or the application. Also, any information about points of interest issued publicly by the business or official representative, or that is developed independently by a user being physically present at a site, is acceptable to add to the map as long as it is provided without copyright.