Michigan/To do/Main: Difference between revisions View history

(*/To_do/Main*/)
(*/To_do/Main*/)
Line 11: Line 11:
This standard was agreed to at the August, 2015 Meetup, and is ready to be presented to the other GLR states for their consideration for adoption.
This standard was agreed to at the August, 2015 Meetup, and is ready to be presented to the other GLR states for their consideration for adoption.


{{Locking Standard|Fwy=5|Ramp="Highest rank of connected segment"|MH=3|mH=3|PS=2|Street=1}}
{{Locking Standard|Fwy=5|Ramp=Highest rank of connected segments|MH=3|mH=3|PS=2|Street=1}}





Revision as of 19:03, 26 August 2015


For spreadsheets above, comments can be inserted, but edits are locked. Send a PM to davielde for editing access.

Road Lock Standard

This standard was agreed to at the August, 2015 Meetup, and is ready to be presented to the other GLR states for their consideration for adoption.

In Michigan we have a set minimum standard for locking roads based on segment type. Any road of a certain segment type must be locked at least to the rank (level) in the chart below. Roads may be locked higher for protection and special situations (areas with construction, tricky design, frequent mistakes, imaging inaccuracies, and the like), but should not be locked lower.

A great time to implement these locks is while bringing the road types of an area into compliance with the current US road type standards (FC and highway systems). Lock the roads based on type after they've been set to current US road type standards.

Michigan Minimum Locking Rank Standard
Segment Type Default locks
 Freeway  5
 Ramp  Highest rank of connected segments
 Major Highway  3
 Minor Highway  3
 Primary Street  2
 Street  1
 • • • • Ferry • • • •   5
 |-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-| Railroad |-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|  2