(Initial page creation from preload) |
Njmedic2535 (talk | contribs) m (→Cameras/Main) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
------ DO NOT MODIFY ABOVE THIS LINE -------- DO NOT MODIFY ABOVE THIS LINE ------> | ------ DO NOT MODIFY ABOVE THIS LINE -------- DO NOT MODIFY ABOVE THIS LINE ------> | ||
Please see for specific guide to mapping cameras in Washington: [[{{BasePage2}}/Cameras]] | |||
Here is the current list of mapped cameras in [[Washington/To_do#Traffic_Cameras|Washington]] | |||
<br> | |||
=== RRC Alerts in NWR === | |||
'''National Guidance for RRC Alerts is currently in development.''' | |||
<br> | |||
<br> | |||
Attempting to provide a consistent user experience and decrease "nuisance" alerts, the State Managers of NWR have agreed upon the following: | |||
<br> | |||
<br> | |||
♦Any crossing where the rails have been removed and/or paved over should not have an alert regardless of gates or warning devices still in place. <br> | |||
♦Any crossing marked out of service by mutcd standards (https://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/htm/2009/part8/part8b.htm) should not have an alert. (This includes "tracks not in service" signs and the removal/hooding/etc of gates and warning devices.)<br> | |||
♦Any crossing where the rails still cross the pavement and has signs/gates/warning devices in place should have an alert, even if the removal of rails/track at another location renders the crossing in question impossible for a train to reach - for a consistent user experience there should be an alert at any crossing that appears legitimate to the driver. | |||
<!---- DO NOT MODIFY BELOW ------ DO NOT MODIFY BELOW ------ DO NOT MODIFY BELOW ---- | <!---- DO NOT MODIFY BELOW ------ DO NOT MODIFY BELOW ------ DO NOT MODIFY BELOW ---- | ||
Latest revision as of 16:43, 31 May 2020
Please see for specific guide to mapping cameras in Washington: Washington/Cameras
Here is the current list of mapped cameras in Washington
RRC Alerts in NWR
National Guidance for RRC Alerts is currently in development.
Attempting to provide a consistent user experience and decrease "nuisance" alerts, the State Managers of NWR have agreed upon the following:
♦Any crossing where the rails have been removed and/or paved over should not have an alert regardless of gates or warning devices still in place.
♦Any crossing marked out of service by mutcd standards (https://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/htm/2009/part8/part8b.htm) should not have an alert. (This includes "tracks not in service" signs and the removal/hooding/etc of gates and warning devices.)
♦Any crossing where the rails still cross the pavement and has signs/gates/warning devices in place should have an alert, even if the removal of rails/track at another location renders the crossing in question impossible for a train to reach - for a consistent user experience there should be an alert at any crossing that appears legitimate to the driver.